Enterprise Rancheria of proposed Yuba County Casino is facing a great problem of opposition by the local community and tribe for construction of its resort. Earlier, Enterprise Rancheria got authorization from government by presenting an extremely inconsistent 2002 letter of understanding amid region and the tribe; thereby showing a strong local support. The central Department ignored the appeals of community groups, voices of local citizens and popular 2005 vote in opposition to the casino. There are a number of legal concerns such as enhanced water use, traffic conflicting with small countryside roads, interference with wildlife, conversion of a highly productive agricultural land into a building, poor fire safety and inequitable competition with small and businesses operated by families.
But now Supreme Court has taken Patchak decision in opposition to the explanations given by legal representative of Enterprise Rancheria. According to Patchak decision, the citizens have a saying and place under the central law. Their benefits related to economic, aesthetic or environmental aspects must be considered by the law as stated by Supreme Court. This decision of the Supreme Court has a great effect on the Yuba County Casino as central administrators were able to get through local antagonism in realization of a completely unconfirmed strong local support for Yuba County Casino in the tribe. But according to Patchak decision of the Supreme Court, the worries and welfare of local citizens must be taken into account.
|Club USA Casino|
|Play Million Casino|
|Club USA Casino||9.37 / 10|
|Lucky Club Casino||9.8 / 10|
|Casino Grand Bay||9.23 / 10|
|Atlantis Gold Casino||9.32 / 10|
|Slotland Casino||9.58 / 10|